Insights from Freedom of Information research: Recommendations for transparency policymaking and practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60733/PMGR.2025.05Keywords:
Freedom of Information, transparency, bureaucratic responsiveness, Open Government, accountabilityAbstract
Freedom of Information (FOI) laws are essential for promoting a culture of transparency and accountability in public administration, yet their practical impact often falls short of expectations. This article synthesizes findings from two empirical studies analyzing citizen information requests submitted via a German FOI platform. The studies highlight the compliance gap between legal provisions (de jure transparency) and actual organizational behavior (de facto transparency), influenced by variations in FOI laws across Germany's federal states and factors such as request topics and communication tone. Drawing on the findings of this prior research, this article offers recommendations for public managers and policymakers to effectively design and implement FOI. In light of Austria’s late FOI implementation in fall 2025, the article specifically addresses the Austrian use case. The practical implications, however, extend beyond the German and Austrian research context and aim to improve responsiveness, foster a culture of openness in the public sector, and leverage digital tools for FOI usage.
References
C. Hood and D. Heald, Eds., Transparency: the key to better governance? in Proceedings of the British Academy, no. 135. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
R. Islam, “Does more transparency go along with better governance?,” Economics & Politics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 121–167, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2006.00166.x.
S. J. Piotrowski, Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2007.
D. Berliner, “The Political Origins of Transparency,” The Journal of Politics, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 479–491, 2014, doi: 10.1017/S0022381613001412.
G. Michener, “FOI Laws Around the World,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 145–159, 2011, doi: 10.1353/jod.2011.0021.
A. Roberts, Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age, 1st ed. Cambridge University Press, 2006. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139165518.
J. Trautendorfer, L. Hohensinn, and D. Hilgers, “From de jure to de facto transparency: Analyzing the compliance gap in light of freedom of information laws,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 253-283, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1111/rego.12615.
J. Trautendorfer, L. Schmidthuber, and D. Hilgers, “Are the answers all out there? Investigating citizen information requests in the haze of bureaucratic responsiveness,” Governance, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 845-865, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1111/gove.12805.
M. Lipsky, Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services, 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2010.
V. L. Lemieux and S. E. Trapnell, Public Access to Information for Development: A Guide to the Effective Implementation of Right to Information Laws. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0879-1.
D. R. “Chip” Stewart, “Let the Sunshine In, or Else: An Examination of the ‘Teeth’ of State and Federal Open Meetings and Open Records Laws,” Communication Law and Policy, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 265–310, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1080/10811680.2010.489858.
L. Schmidthuber, J. Willems, and B. Krabina, “Trust in Public Performance Information: The Effect of Data Accessibility and Data Source,” Public Administration Review, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 279-295, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1111/puar.13603.
D. Carter and C. Stratton, “Information Systems as Mediators of Freedom of Information Requests,” in K. Toeppe, H. Yan, and S. K. W. Chu, Eds., Diversity, Divergence, Dialogue. iConference 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12646, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 274–282. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-71305-8_22.
D. Berliner, “Sunlight or Window Dressing? Local Government Compliance with South Africa’s Promotion of Access to Information Act.” Governance, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 641–661, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1111/gove.12246.
G. Michener, E. Contreras, and I. Niskier, “From opacity to transparency? Evaluating access to information in Brazil five years later,” Rev. Adm. Pública, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 610–629, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1590/0034-761220170289.
G. Michener, J. Coelho, and D. Moreira, “Are governments complying with transparency? Findings from 15 years of evaluation,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1-12, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101565.
J. F. Baldissera, D. Dall’Asta, D. G. D. Vesco, J. E. Scarpin, and C. Fiirst, “Determinants of public transparency: A study in Brazilian local governments,” Public Money & Management, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 331–339, May 2023, doi: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1965390.
G. Michener and S. Nichter, “Local compliance with national transparency legislation,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1-10, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101659.
D. A. D. Sol, “The institutional, economic and social determinants of local government transparency,” Journal of Economic Policy Reform, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 90–107, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/17487870.2012.759422.
P. J. DiMaggio and W. W. Powell, “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 147-160, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.2307/2095101.
